500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LOWVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

66

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

33

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

74

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

52

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

46

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.