500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH LEWIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

117

41%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

112

37%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

60

42%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

73

51%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

72

48%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

109

40%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

102

45%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

100

41%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

54

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

57

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

81

46%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

88

44%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.