500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

358
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

252

36%

LEVEL 3

247

36%

LEVEL 4

111

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

188

31%

LEVEL 3

239

39%

LEVEL 4

127

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

58

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

337
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

78

12%

LEVEL 2

238

36%

LEVEL 3

234

36%

LEVEL 4

103

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

346
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

54

9%

LEVEL 2

177

31%

LEVEL 3

229

40%

LEVEL 4

117

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

46

7%

LEVEL 2

226

36%

LEVEL 3

243

39%

LEVEL 4

110

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

167

30%

LEVEL 3

235

42%

LEVEL 4

126

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

35

53%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

28

52%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

327
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

53

9%

LEVEL 2

207

35%

LEVEL 3

220

37%

LEVEL 4

107

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

338
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

159

30%

LEVEL 3

218

41%

LEVEL 4

120

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

45

43%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.