500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

122

30%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

95

23%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

90

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

85

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

88

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

42

67%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

34

56%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

88

35%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

72

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.