500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

387
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 846

LEVEL 1

153

18%

LEVEL 2

306

36%

LEVEL 3

247

29%

LEVEL 4

140

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

121

20%

LEVEL 2

188

31%

LEVEL 3

181

29%

LEVEL 4

125

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

160

37%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

69

22%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 785

LEVEL 1

139

18%

LEVEL 2

280

36%

LEVEL 3

231

29%

LEVEL 4

135

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

291
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

113

20%

LEVEL 2

174

30%

LEVEL 3

172

30%

LEVEL 4

119

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

74

10%

LEVEL 2

269

38%

LEVEL 3

238

33%

LEVEL 4

135

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

171

32%

LEVEL 3

174

33%

LEVEL 4

120

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

79

61%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

56

66%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

166

33%

LEVEL 3

172

34%

LEVEL 4

110

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

107

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

101

29%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.