500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

154

21%

LEVEL 2

261

35%

LEVEL 3

223

30%

LEVEL 4

98

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

138

19%

LEVEL 2

247

34%

LEVEL 3

230

32%

LEVEL 4

113

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

126

33%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

142

21%

LEVEL 2

241

35%

LEVEL 3

205

30%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

318
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

114

17%

LEVEL 2

228

35%

LEVEL 3

214

32%

LEVEL 4

104

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

92

15%

LEVEL 2

224

36%

LEVEL 3

215

34%

LEVEL 4

97

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

79

13%

LEVEL 2

217

35%

LEVEL 3

212

34%

LEVEL 4

112

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

62

57%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

59

55%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

75

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

165

37%

LEVEL 4

93

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

92

33%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

320
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

149

20%

LEVEL 2

258

35%

LEVEL 3

222

31%

LEVEL 4

98

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

340
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

136

19%

LEVEL 2

246

34%

LEVEL 3

229

32%

LEVEL 4

111

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.