500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 719

LEVEL 1

148

21%

LEVEL 2

296

41%

LEVEL 3

212

29%

LEVEL 4

63

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

154

21%

LEVEL 2

261

35%

LEVEL 3

223

30%

LEVEL 4

98

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

138

38%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

97

28%

LEVEL 2

158

45%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

255
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

132

20%

LEVEL 2

277

42%

LEVEL 3

198

30%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

142

21%

LEVEL 2

241

35%

LEVEL 3

205

30%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

85

14%

LEVEL 2

266

43%

LEVEL 3

205

33%

LEVEL 4

62

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

92

15%

LEVEL 2

224

36%

LEVEL 3

215

34%

LEVEL 4

97

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

63

62%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

62

57%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

183

41%

LEVEL 3

151

34%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

75

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.