500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MEDINA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 750

LEVEL 1

291

39%

LEVEL 2

278

37%

LEVEL 3

140

19%

LEVEL 4

41

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

224

40%

LEVEL 2

200

35%

LEVEL 3

93

16%

LEVEL 4

47

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

128

34%

LEVEL 2

143

38%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

163

43%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

128

46%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

35

55%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

32

54%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

197

34%

LEVEL 2

223

38%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

38

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

152

36%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

229

34%

LEVEL 2

270

40%

LEVEL 3

139

20%

LEVEL 4

41

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

163

33%

LEVEL 2

197

40%

LEVEL 3

91

18%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

62

87%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

61

92%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

133

40%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

211

51%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

46

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

175

51%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

37

11%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

181
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

288

39%

LEVEL 2

273

37%

LEVEL 3

140

19%

LEVEL 4

41

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

140
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

220

39%

LEVEL 2

198

35%

LEVEL 3

93

17%

LEVEL 4

47

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.