500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EMMA E SHERMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

93

20%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

146

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

95

20%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

130

27%

LEVEL 4

158

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

70

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

76

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

91

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

30

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

98

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

105

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

23

38%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

106

25%

LEVEL 4

143

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

91

21%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

156

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

33

70%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

38

70%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

243
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

107

25%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

143

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

280
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

79

18%

LEVEL 2

90

20%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

156

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

94

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

103

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

286
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

91

19%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

157

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.