500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EMMA E SHERMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

98

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

134

29%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

105

22%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

50

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

23

36%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

20

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

27

48%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

22

61%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

97

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

97

23%

LEVEL 2

126

30%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

90

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

28

55%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

37

70%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

97

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

194
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

110

25%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

91

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

19

49%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

60

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

55

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

130

28%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

89

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.