500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FLOYD S WINSLOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

20

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

21

20%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

27

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

22

76%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.