500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 42-ABELARD REYNOLDS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

162

62%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

155

60%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

65

54%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

68

57%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

97

69%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

87

63%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

24

40%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

97

71%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

98

72%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

36

65%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

112

57%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

94

50%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

50

79%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

61

87%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

154

62%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

145

60%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

15

30%

LEVEL 2

24

48%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

147

70%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

140

66%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

157

62%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

148

60%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.