500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 39-ANDREW J TOWNSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

245

74%

LEVEL 2

59

18%

LEVEL 3

21

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

235

75%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

17

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

115

77%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

108

76%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

130

72%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

127

74%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

153

74%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

136

73%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

79

75%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

87

81%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

176

68%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

159

69%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

69

93%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

76

92%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

225

75%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

240

75%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

225

75%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

224

73%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

205

75%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

21

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

30

77%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.