500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 19-DR CHARLES T LUNSFORD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

183

75%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

160

70%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

78

68%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

64

63%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

105

80%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

96

76%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

138

73%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

125

69%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

119

68%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

96

61%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

64

90%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

64

90%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

161

73%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

145

69%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

22

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

177

75%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

154

72%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

169

77%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

146

70%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.