500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 35-PINNACLE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

203

72%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

187

69%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

90

72%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

85

70%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

113

72%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

102

68%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

63

63%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

53

55%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

127

80%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

123

82%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

156

68%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

144

64%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

47

94%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

43

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

87

58%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

78

54%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

116

88%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

109

87%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

191

73%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

182

72%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

168

69%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

168

67%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

35

90%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

19

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.