500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

DR. IRIS J. BANISTER SCHOOL NO. 33 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

308

60%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

56

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

239

62%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

150

62%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

114

60%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

158

58%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

125

63%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

187

58%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

143

63%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

110

63%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

86

60%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

222

56%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

180

59%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

86

72%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

59

74%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

255

57%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

55

12%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

201

59%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

53

79%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

292

60%

LEVEL 2

131

27%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

227

63%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.