500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

140

31%

LEVEL 2

167

37%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

137

27%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

148

30%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

87

38%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

128

31%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

124

26%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

139

30%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

148

33%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

48

81%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

47

82%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

89

49%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

90

42%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.