500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MCVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

172

70%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

189

72%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

84

71%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

94

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

88

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

95

70%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

49

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

82
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

66

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

80

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

82

80%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

35

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

33

54%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

171

73%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

186

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

171

75%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

186

75%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

116

78%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

133

80%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

56

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

56

59%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.