500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MCVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

138

42%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

110

39%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

77

46%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

63

46%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

18

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

74

42%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

56

41%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

33

48%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

28

38%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

131

44%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

62

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

187
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

137

43%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

119

46%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

85

41%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

33

47%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.