500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WOODLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 934

LEVEL 1

142

15%

LEVEL 2

320

34%

LEVEL 3

269

29%

LEVEL 4

203

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

196

33%

LEVEL 4

143

24%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

75

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

220
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

124

27%

LEVEL 4

96

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

68

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

63

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

121
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

62

39%

LEVEL 4

59

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

278
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

189

35%

LEVEL 3

172

31%

LEVEL 4

106

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

454
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 799

LEVEL 1

67

8%

LEVEL 2

278

35%

LEVEL 3

252

32%

LEVEL 4

202

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

156

30%

LEVEL 3

189

37%

LEVEL 4

142

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

75

56%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

34

45%

LEVEL 2

33

44%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

465
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 901

LEVEL 1

122

14%

LEVEL 2

314

35%

LEVEL 3

267

30%

LEVEL 4

198

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

336
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

178

32%

LEVEL 3

194

35%

LEVEL 4

142

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

395
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

98

13%

LEVEL 2

252

34%

LEVEL 3

222

30%

LEVEL 4

173

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

138

31%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

120

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.