500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NEW VISIONS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

84

40%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

49

45%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

39

39%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

52

47%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

9

69%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

29

45%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

19

32%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

55

46%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

62

49%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

68

38%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

25

74%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

17

26%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

24

37%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

71

49%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.