500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 2 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

42

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

25

35%

LEVEL 4

21

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

68

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

39

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

67

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

42

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

41

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.