500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MICHAEL F STOKES SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

38

42%

LEVEL 4

23

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

42

41%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

65

41%

LEVEL 4

38

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

54

42%

LEVEL 4

32

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

20

47%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.