500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MICHAEL F STOKES SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

124

39%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

75

45%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

39

42%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

15

56%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

123

41%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

122

40%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

109

40%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.