500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ISLAND TREES MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

47

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

20

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

56

42%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

44

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

16

24%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

79

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

61

36%

LEVEL 4

47

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

61

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

18

22%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

24

29%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.