500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

VALLEY STREAM MEMORIAL JR HS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

119

25%

LEVEL 2

216

45%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

134

44%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

116

50%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

73

50%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

100

41%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

41

43%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

76

49%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

32

25%

LEVEL 2

70

54%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

32

44%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

202

48%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

129

47%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

40

74%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

145

45%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

71

45%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

29

31%

LEVEL 2

43

46%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.