500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH SALEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

86

42%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

58

32%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

50

46%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

44

46%

LEVEL 4

31

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

36

37%

LEVEL 4

24

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

27

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

15

71%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

64

42%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

58

45%

LEVEL 4

43

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

79

46%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

68

44%

LEVEL 4

55

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

86

43%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

73

41%

LEVEL 4

58

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

82

44%

LEVEL 4

46

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

68

43%

LEVEL 4

56

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.