500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MUNSEY PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

371
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

69

15%

LEVEL 3

150

32%

LEVEL 4

221

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

418
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

52

11%

LEVEL 3

157

32%

LEVEL 4

261

53%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

96

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

96

40%

LEVEL 4

100

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

193
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

125

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

161

64%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

66

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

82

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

258
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

54

16%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

143

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

276
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

162

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

11

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

65

15%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

216

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

47

10%

LEVEL 3

152

32%

LEVEL 4

257

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

368
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

68

15%

LEVEL 3

148

32%

LEVEL 4

220

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

415
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

48

10%

LEVEL 3

155

32%

LEVEL 4

260

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.