500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MUNSEY PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

417
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

101

18%

LEVEL 3

186

33%

LEVEL 4

231

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

82

16%

LEVEL 3

151

30%

LEVEL 4

227

45%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

100

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

101

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

234
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

131

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

208
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

126

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

42

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

36

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

341
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

76

17%

LEVEL 3

157

35%

LEVEL 4

184

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

297
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

63

16%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

182

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

408
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

90

17%

LEVEL 3

179

35%

LEVEL 4

229

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

75

16%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

223

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

413
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

96

18%

LEVEL 3

182

34%

LEVEL 4

231

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

373
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

79

16%

LEVEL 3

147

31%

LEVEL 4

226

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.