500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CARLE PLACE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

116

36%

LEVEL 4

100

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

133

35%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

62

41%

LEVEL 4

48

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

59

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

52

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

74

36%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

21

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

69

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

93

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

109

39%

LEVEL 4

95

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

131

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

20

50%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

99

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

250
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

130

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

98

39%

LEVEL 4

87

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

111

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

22

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.