500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

75

53%

LEVEL 4

50

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

61

39%

LEVEL 4

66

43%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

39

56%

LEVEL 4

26

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

27

38%

LEVEL 4

35

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

36

50%

LEVEL 4

24

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

34

41%

LEVEL 4

31

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

52

53%

LEVEL 4

36

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

97
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

39

34%

LEVEL 4

58

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

14

54%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

17

55%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

66

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

59

40%

LEVEL 4

66

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

68

52%

LEVEL 4

46

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

55

39%

LEVEL 4

60

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.