500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

94

23%

LEVEL 3

162

39%

LEVEL 4

131

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

126

42%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

77

38%

LEVEL 4

65

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

62

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

85

40%

LEVEL 4

66

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

64

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

117
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

15

11%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

66

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

126
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

83

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

59

41%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

75

21%

LEVEL 3

150

41%

LEVEL 4

128

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

125

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

11

58%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

284
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

94

23%

LEVEL 3

158

39%

LEVEL 4

126

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

226
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

108

38%

LEVEL 4

118

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

159

40%

LEVEL 4

129

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

122

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.