500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 184 SHUANG WEN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

109

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

158

39%

LEVEL 4

105

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

78

39%

LEVEL 4

58

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

90

42%

LEVEL 4

59

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

68

36%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

8

89%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

194
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

109

38%

LEVEL 4

85

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

199
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

113

39%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

15

42%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

16

47%

LEVEL 4

12

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

130

40%

LEVEL 4

105

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

143

41%

LEVEL 4

102

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

9

19%

LEVEL 2

25

53%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

26

43%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

241
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

89

26%

LEVEL 3

132

39%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

257
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

152

41%

LEVEL 4

105

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

40

39%

LEVEL 4

37

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

62

52%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.