500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 3 CHARRETTE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

128

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

128

46%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

65

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

63

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

63

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

65

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

14

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

100

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

89

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

109

38%

LEVEL 4

121

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

121

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

248
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

123

37%

LEVEL 4

125

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

126

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

114

38%

LEVEL 4

120

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

107

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.