500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 33 CHELSEA PREP GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

49

40%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

37

34%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

25

43%

LEVEL 4

16

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

57
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

28

39%

LEVEL 4

29

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

23

58%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

30

46%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

18

42%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

36

44%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

86

42%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

42

44%

LEVEL 4

29

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

68

50%

LEVEL 4

48

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.