500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 59 BEEKMAN HILL INTERNATIONAL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

29

12%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

111

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

30

12%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

143

57%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

63

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

79

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

48

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

64

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

19

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

35

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

71

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

84

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

74

37%

LEVEL 4

103

51%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

128

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

199
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

28

12%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

107

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

195
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

24

10%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

136

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

85

38%

LEVEL 4

100

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

136

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.