500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 41 GREENWICH VILLAGE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

46

14%

LEVEL 3

141

43%

LEVEL 4

135

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

139

41%

LEVEL 4

133

39%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

69

40%

LEVEL 4

82

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

89

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

72

46%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

68

44%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

13

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

18

47%

LEVEL 4

14

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

90

40%

LEVEL 4

101

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

36

15%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

93

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

20

54%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

119

45%

LEVEL 4

125

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

117

42%

LEVEL 4

122

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

268
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

41

13%

LEVEL 3

137

44%

LEVEL 4

131

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

262
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

55

17%

LEVEL 3

132

41%

LEVEL 4

130

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.