500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 158 BAYARD TAYLOR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

41

13%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

177

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

49

15%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

180

55%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

100

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

95

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

77

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

85

52%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

9

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

19

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

28

85%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

128

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

128

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

26

9%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

162

58%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

172

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

15

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

267
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

173

55%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

255
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

170

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

10

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

161

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

34

12%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

164

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

19

36%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.