500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 158 BAYARD TAYLOR GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

140

43%

LEVEL 4

97

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

119

42%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

81

48%

LEVEL 4

56

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

57

41%

LEVEL 4

63

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

41

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

56

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

21

50%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

20

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

95

44%

LEVEL 4

69

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

85

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

115

45%

LEVEL 4

92

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

90

39%

LEVEL 4

104

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

15

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

236
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

139

44%

LEVEL 4

97

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

54

20%

LEVEL 3

118

44%

LEVEL 4

90

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

109

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.