500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MS 131 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

80

20%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

203
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

122

38%

LEVEL 4

81

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

202
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

108

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

25

44%

LEVEL 2

26

46%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

24

53%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

106

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

41

62%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

50

66%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

50

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

105

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.