500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MS 131 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

99

26%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

140
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

153
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

38

54%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

41

57%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

114

42%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

108

38%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

74

72%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

50

68%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

12

50%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

76

24%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

29

38%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

19

44%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.