500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

105

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

102

54%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

63

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

45

36%

LEVEL 4

70

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

42

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

32

50%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

9

64%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

21

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

22

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

63

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

66

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

67%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

101

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

96

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

103

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

71

41%

LEVEL 4

96

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.