500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 234 INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

161

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

147

49%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

83

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

80

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

63

40%

LEVEL 4

78

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

58

39%

LEVEL 4

67

46%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

17

53%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

24

83%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

22

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

109

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

100

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

148

59%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

135

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

25

45%

LEVEL 4

13

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

19

34%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

246
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

145

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

242
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

29

11%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

152

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

140

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

17

55%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.