500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 217 ROOSEVELT ISLAND GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

107

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

117

38%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

53

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

57

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

54

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

60

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

40

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

50

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

46

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

50

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

15

32%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

14

26%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

105

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

115

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

21

47%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

103

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

183
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

104

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

74

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

78

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

33

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

39

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.