500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 212 MIDTOWN WEST GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

71

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

72

44%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

30

37%

LEVEL 4

34

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

41

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

37

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

31

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

41

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

38

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

68

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

66

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

60

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

63

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

9

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.