500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 87 WILLIAM SHERMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

144

41%

LEVEL 4

131

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

55

14%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

155

41%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

76

44%

LEVEL 4

73

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

93

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

58

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

90

48%

LEVEL 4

62

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

92

41%

LEVEL 4

94

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

205
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

106

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

14

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

119

42%

LEVEL 4

120

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

129

43%

LEVEL 4

139

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

25

39%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

274
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

61

18%

LEVEL 3

143

42%

LEVEL 4

131

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

53

14%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

155

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

136

42%

LEVEL 4

125

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

289
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

47

14%

LEVEL 3

138

40%

LEVEL 4

151

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.