500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 87 WILLIAM SHERMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

87

22%

LEVEL 3

165

42%

LEVEL 4

134

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

144

41%

LEVEL 4

131

38%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

82

40%

LEVEL 4

76

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

76

44%

LEVEL 4

73

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

58

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

58

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

20

65%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

109

41%

LEVEL 4

107

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

92

41%

LEVEL 4

94

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

24

43%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

14

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

149

45%

LEVEL 4

123

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

119

42%

LEVEL 4

120

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

30

48%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

25

39%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

299
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

82

21%

LEVEL 3

165

42%

LEVEL 4

134

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

274
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

61

18%

LEVEL 3

143

42%

LEVEL 4

131

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

127

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

136

42%

LEVEL 4

125

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.