500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 76 A PHILLIP RANDOLPH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

97

38%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

47

41%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

48

44%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

24

49%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

16

32%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

71

34%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

27

59%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

20

87%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

96

40%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

80

36%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

23

41%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.