500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 199 JESSIE ISADOR STRAUS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

296

69%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

43

10%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

297

69%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

152

72%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

198
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

156

72%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

144

65%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

141

65%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

16

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

57

84%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

63

89%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

195

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

242
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

188

70%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

26

47%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

21

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

266

74%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

21

6%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

266

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

51
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

30

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

48
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

31

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

372
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

42

10%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

292

69%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

356
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

279

73%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

340
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

34

9%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

270

71%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

17

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

27

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.