500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MS 245 COMPUTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

43

12%

LEVEL 3

139

38%

LEVEL 4

168

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

190

51%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

97

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

110

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

71

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

80

46%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

18

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

15

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

92

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

106

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

22

55%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

42

44%

LEVEL 4

33

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

50

47%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

163

54%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

178

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

299
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

188

52%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

134

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

154

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

34

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

37

36%

LEVEL 4

36

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

301
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

41

12%

LEVEL 3

134

38%

LEVEL 4

167

47%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

295
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

51

14%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

187

52%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.